Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date: 2003-11-18 08:22:45
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B871FFFE@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net]
> Sent: 17 November 2003 23:31
> To: Josh Berkus
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
>
> Josh Berkus writes:
>
> > Given all that, don't people think it's time to jump to 8.0?
>
> As has been said before, many people think that a Windows
> port is the least interesting feature ever to happen to
> PostgreSQL, so you're going to have to come up with better
> reasons.

Least interesting to many user perhaps, but lost of them seen to think
that it's important for expanding our userbase:
http://www.postgresql.org/survey.php?View=1&SurveyID=9

That can't be a bad thing.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-18 09:22:33 Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2003-11-18 07:36:07 Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-18 09:15:13 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message Andreas Grabmller 2003-11-18 08:13:40 Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length