From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Date: | 2003-11-18 09:15:13 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0311181012360.3317-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dann Corbit writes:
> > > Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.
> >
> > No, it does not.
>
> Really?
>
> What's this then?
> http://www.cygwin.com/licensing.html
The Cygwin license, the GPL, specifically says:
Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not
covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of
running the Program is not restricted, ...
So "commercial use" is clearly allowed.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-18 09:22:33 | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-11-18 08:22:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |