| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RC1? |
| Date: | 2002-11-13 18:53:00 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0211131947280.12428-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
Tom Lane writes:
> We can't just wait around indefinitely for port reports that may or may
> not ever appear. In any case, most of the "<7.3" entries in the list
> seem to be various flavors of *BSD; I think it's unlikely we broke
> those ...
Note that we have *zero* reports for any flavor of NetBSD and OpenBSD.
That is highly suspicious, and I would not venture a guess about how
likely it is they're broken.
(Maybe you could get someone from Red Hat to confirm the remaining Linux
ports?)
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-11-13 19:53:28 | Re: pg_dump in 7.4 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-13 17:33:50 | Re: RC1? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-11-14 03:25:07 | Re: RC1? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-13 17:33:50 | Re: RC1? |