Re: RC1?

From: Scott Lamb <slamb(at)slamb(dot)org>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RC1?
Date: 2002-11-14 21:42:42
Message-ID: 3DD418D2.7010009@slamb.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

Tom Lane wrote:

> Seriously, I agree with Marc's opinion that issuing an RC1 is the best
> way to flush out some more port reports. I do not know what else we can
> do to get people off their duffs and onto last-minute testing.

If testing is the problem, I think publicizing the betas would help
more. I had no idea that 7.3b[2-5] had been released. And looking at the
website, it's not hard to see why:

<http://www.postgresql.org/>: No mention
<http://www14.us.postgresql.org/> (or whatever mirror): No mention
<http://www14.us.postgresql.org/news.html>: No mention
<http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php>: Mentions beta has begun
<http://developer.postgresql.org/beta.php>: Shows latest release at
bottom of page.

I'd really expect to see an announcement on the news page for each beta
release and the latest stable/beta release on the front page. That would
help more than releasing RC1, especially if it's done in the same way.

Thanks,
Scott

In response to

  • Re: RC1? at 2002-11-13 18:53:00 from Peter Eisentraut

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2002-11-14 21:44:07 Re: Propose RC1 for Friday ...
Previous Message snpe 2002-11-14 21:32:49 Re: create or replace view

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2002-11-14 23:05:49 Re: RC1?
Previous Message Patrick Welche 2002-11-14 18:53:52 Re: RC1?