From: | Scott Lamb <slamb(at)slamb(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RC1? |
Date: | 2002-11-14 21:42:42 |
Message-ID: | 3DD418D2.7010009@slamb.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Seriously, I agree with Marc's opinion that issuing an RC1 is the best
> way to flush out some more port reports. I do not know what else we can
> do to get people off their duffs and onto last-minute testing.
If testing is the problem, I think publicizing the betas would help
more. I had no idea that 7.3b[2-5] had been released. And looking at the
website, it's not hard to see why:
<http://www.postgresql.org/>: No mention
<http://www14.us.postgresql.org/> (or whatever mirror): No mention
<http://www14.us.postgresql.org/news.html>: No mention
<http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php>: Mentions beta has begun
<http://developer.postgresql.org/beta.php>: Shows latest release at
bottom of page.
I'd really expect to see an announcement on the news page for each beta
release and the latest stable/beta release on the front page. That would
help more than releasing RC1, especially if it's done in the same way.
Thanks,
Scott
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-11-14 21:44:07 | Re: Propose RC1 for Friday ... |
Previous Message | snpe | 2002-11-14 21:32:49 | Re: create or replace view |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2002-11-14 23:05:49 | Re: RC1? |
Previous Message | Patrick Welche | 2002-11-14 18:53:52 | Re: RC1? |