| From: | Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RC1? |
| Date: | 2002-11-14 18:13:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20021114181356.F18637@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 07:53:00PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > We can't just wait around indefinitely for port reports that may or may
> > not ever appear. In any case, most of the "<7.3" entries in the list
> > seem to be various flavors of *BSD; I think it's unlikely we broke
> > those ...
>
> Note that we have *zero* reports for any flavor of NetBSD and OpenBSD.
> That is highly suspicious, and I would not venture a guess about how
> likely it is they're broken.
Does all OK on this count?
PostgreSQL 7.3b1 on i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6H, compiled by GCC 2.95.3
(I'm trying to build bison at the mo to have a go with whatever is in cvs
tip at the moment.)
Cheers,
Patrick
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-14 18:33:05 | Re: Propose RC1 for Friday ... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-14 17:45:51 | Re: create or replace view |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-14 18:39:23 | Re: RC1? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-14 14:53:33 | Re: Add OpenBSD 3.1 i386 to supported platforms (was: RC1?) |