Re: RC1?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RC1?
Date: 2002-11-14 18:39:23
Message-ID: 200211141839.gAEIdNR17553@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports


Ports list updated:

http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 07:53:00PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >
> > > We can't just wait around indefinitely for port reports that may or may
> > > not ever appear. In any case, most of the "<7.3" entries in the list
> > > seem to be various flavors of *BSD; I think it's unlikely we broke
> > > those ...
> >
> > Note that we have *zero* reports for any flavor of NetBSD and OpenBSD.
> > That is highly suspicious, and I would not venture a guess about how
> > likely it is they're broken.
>
> Does all OK on this count?
>
> PostgreSQL 7.3b1 on i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6H, compiled by GCC 2.95.3
>
> (I'm trying to build bison at the mo to have a go with whatever is in cvs
> tip at the moment.)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Patrick
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

  • Re: RC1? at 2002-11-14 18:13:56 from Patrick Welche

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Patrick Welche 2002-11-14 18:53:52 Re: RC1?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-11-14 18:33:05 Re: Propose RC1 for Friday ...

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Patrick Welche 2002-11-14 18:53:52 Re: RC1?
Previous Message Patrick Welche 2002-11-14 18:13:56 Re: RC1?