From: | Ricardo Junior <suga(at)netbsd(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
Date: | 2002-07-06 19:41:48 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0207061639400.445-100000@ricardo.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Maybe not so obvious when people start asking what this "QL"
means. ;-)
[]'s
Ricardo.
On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I think the problem is that PostgreSQL is both a name and an acronym,
> > mixed into single word. Postgres is a name, SQL is an acronym,
> > PostgreSQL is both. That is where people get confused.
>
> The problem is that the typography makes it look like the split should
> be "Postgre / SQL". I can see exactly why people think the name portion
> is "Postgre" --- it's not at all apparent that the "S" is part of both
> parts of the word, until you've been told.
>
> Had we capitalized the name like "PostgresQL" maybe the correct
> pronunciation would be more obvious.
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-06 19:53:15 | Re: old 7.2 bug? |
Previous Message | Ricardo Junior | 2002-07-06 19:33:16 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sander Steffann | 2002-07-06 21:28:44 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
Previous Message | Ricardo Junior | 2002-07-06 19:33:16 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |