From: | "Sander Steffann" <sander(at)steffann(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Andrew Sullivan" <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
Date: | 2002-07-06 21:28:44 |
Message-ID: | 001d01c22534$1b6a3eb0$64c8a8c0@balefire10ww |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > The idea of calling it "Postgres SQL Server" has merit because it is so
> > close to what we already have, just an added 's' and a space.
>
> ... and a M$ trademark violation suit, just waiting to happen whenever
> M$ decides we are big enough to be a threat.
>
> Stay far far away from any name including "SQL Server".
Then we just leave out the 'Server' :-)
> (I still like plain "Postgres" though.)
If you make it 'Postgres SQL' you have it all. Sure, everybody will call it
'Postgres' (like a lot of them do now). But you still have the 'PostgreSQL'
feeling...
Just my feeling though...
Sander
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | robert sanford | 2002-07-06 21:37:54 | PostgreSQL Advocacy |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-06 21:27:00 | Re: old 7.2 bug? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-06 21:32:53 | Re: UNIQUE predicate |
Previous Message | Ricardo Junior | 2002-07-06 19:41:48 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |