From: | Ricardo Junior <suga(at)netbsd(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
Date: | 2002-07-06 19:33:16 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0207061629200.445-100000@ricardo.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
> I didn't write it correctly. He said "Postgray" I think or "Postgree".
> Both made me feel a little ill. The strange thing is that until
> PostgreSQL got popular, no one really said the word, we just wrote it,
> and my editor has a "PostgreSQL" string macro so I don't even type it
> anymore, but when you start to talk to people, it does become a problem.
>
> The idea of calling it "Postgres SQL Server" has merit because it is so
> close to what we already have, just an added 's' and a space.
Is this under discussion? I do think that "PostgreSQL" is a good
name but does cause a lot of confusion. I usually call it just "Postgres".
I don't see the necessity of having "SQL" in it's name, although "Postgres
SQL" is also interesting.
[]'s
Ricardo.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ricardo Junior | 2002-07-06 19:41:48 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
Previous Message | Steve Atkins | 2002-07-06 19:09:15 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ricardo Junior | 2002-07-06 19:41:48 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
Previous Message | Steve Atkins | 2002-07-06 19:09:15 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |