| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Medi Montaseri <medi(dot)montaseri(at)intransa(dot)com>, Francisco Reyes <lists(at)natserv(dot)com>, pgsql General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits |
| Date: | 2002-11-20 22:08:57 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0211201506510.21504-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
On 20 Nov 2002, Neil Conway wrote:
> Medi Montaseri <medi(dot)montaseri(at)intransa(dot)com> writes:
> > I think from the data integrity point of view, vacuum is more
> > important than vacuum full.
>
> Why would VACUUM have any effect on data integrity, either positive or
> negative?
Maybe he's thinking of the problems createed when one runs out of disk
space? :-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-11-20 22:11:58 | Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits |
| Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2002-11-20 22:02:22 | Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-11-20 22:11:58 | Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits |
| Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2002-11-20 22:02:22 | Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections |