Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Medi Montaseri <medi(dot)montaseri(at)intransa(dot)com>
Cc: Francisco Reyes <lists(at)natserv(dot)com>, pgsql General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits
Date: 2002-11-20 21:33:15
Message-ID: 87wun83p0k.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-sql

Medi Montaseri <medi(dot)montaseri(at)intransa(dot)com> writes:
> I think from the data integrity point of view, vacuum is more
> important than vacuum full.

Why would VACUUM have any effect on data integrity, either positive or
negative?

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ryan Wright 2002-11-20 21:55:16 Request assistance connecting with Pg::connectdb
Previous Message * Tong * 2002-11-20 21:26:00 About pgaccess tables

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-11-20 21:57:14 Re: Trees: maintaining pathnames
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-11-20 21:15:57 Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits