From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Francisco Reyes <lists(at)natserv(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits |
Date: | 2002-11-20 21:15:57 |
Message-ID: | 873cpw54du.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
Francisco Reyes <lists(at)natserv(dot)com> writes:
> On 20 Nov 2002, Neil Conway wrote:
> > Not if the connection is made to the database as the PostgreSQL
> > superuser.
>
> So this would be new to 7.3. Right?
Yes.
> Right now if there are connections open "vacuum full" will wait from those
> connectins to close, even if the vacuum is done from the superuser.
Erm, no -- VACUUM FULL doesn't block on connections, it blocks waiting
to acquire locks. Whether or not a client is allowed to connect to the
database has no relation to the locks the client can acquire once
they've connected.
> > Heh, no where at the moment, as there wasn't isn't any documentation
> > on this new feature :-) Attached is a patch that adds some (also sent
> > to -patches).
>
> So there will be a way to reserve connectinos for the super-user, but will
> there be a way to limit number of connection per user?
Not in 7.3, AFAIK.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | * Tong * | 2002-11-20 21:26:00 | About pgaccess tables |
Previous Message | Chris Boget | 2002-11-20 20:10:23 | Re: List of currently connected users |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-11-20 21:33:15 | Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits |
Previous Message | Dan Langille | 2002-11-20 20:20:15 | Re: Trees: maintaining pathnames |