From: | Francisco Reyes <lists(at)natserv(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits |
Date: | 2002-11-20 18:56:36 |
Message-ID: | 20021120135451.V30106-100000@zoraida.natserv.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
On 20 Nov 2002, Neil Conway wrote:
> Francisco Reyes <lists(at)natserv(dot)com> writes:
> > But wouldn't "vacuum full" still fail?
>
> Not if the connection is made to the database as the PostgreSQL
> superuser.
So this would be new to 7.3. Right?
Right now if there are connections open "vacuum full" will wait from those
connectins to close, even if the vacuum is done from the superuser.
> Heh, no where at the moment, as there wasn't isn't any documentation
> on this new feature :-) Attached is a patch that adds some (also sent
> to -patches).
So there will be a way to reserve connectinos for the super-user, but will
there be a way to limit number of connection per user?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Medi Montaseri | 2002-11-20 19:00:53 | Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits |
Previous Message | Francisco Reyes | 2002-11-20 18:54:33 | Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Medi Montaseri | 2002-11-20 19:00:53 | Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits |
Previous Message | Francisco Reyes | 2002-11-20 18:54:33 | Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits |