Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Francisco Reyes <lists(at)natserv(dot)com>, pgsql General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits
Date: 2002-11-20 22:11:58
Message-ID: 87r8df51sh.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-sql

Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 18:36, Neil Conway wrote:
> > + The default value is 2. This must be at least as large as the
> > + value of <varname>max_connections</varname>. This parameter
>
> At least as large?

Woops :-) You're completely correct, of course.

New version of the patch is attached (another copy sent to -patches
separately).

Thanks for spotting my mistakes, Oliver!

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

Attachment Content-Type Size
reserved_conn_docs-2.patch text/x-patch 3.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 2002-11-20 22:12:58 Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequence
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2002-11-20 22:08:57 Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 2002-11-20 22:12:58 Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequence
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2002-11-20 22:08:57 Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits