Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!
Date: 2001-02-14 17:37:57
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0102141808310.1112-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> > Also, could the "-F" option be disabled now that WAL is enabled? Or is
> > there still some reason to encourage/allow folks to use it?
>
> I was the one who put it back in after Vadim turned it off ;-) ... and
> I'll object to any attempt to remove the option.

The description should be updated though:
http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/runtime-config.htm#RUNTIME-CONFIG-GENERAL

I guess a lot of people have heard the rumour "PG 7.1 offers no-fsync
performance with fsync turned on" and extrapolated "Imagine what it can do
if I turn off fsync anyway."

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fred Yankowski 2001-02-14 17:44:00 possible to create CVS branch for proposed patch?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-02-14 17:27:23 Re: Open 7.1 items