| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!! |
| Date: | 2001-02-14 17:37:57 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0102141808310.1112-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> > Also, could the "-F" option be disabled now that WAL is enabled? Or is
> > there still some reason to encourage/allow folks to use it?
>
> I was the one who put it back in after Vadim turned it off ;-) ... and
> I'll object to any attempt to remove the option.
The description should be updated though:
http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/runtime-config.htm#RUNTIME-CONFIG-GENERAL
I guess a lot of people have heard the rumour "PG 7.1 offers no-fsync
performance with fsync turned on" and extrapolated "Imagine what it can do
if I turn off fsync anyway."
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fred Yankowski | 2001-02-14 17:44:00 | possible to create CVS branch for proposed patch? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-02-14 17:27:23 | Re: Open 7.1 items |