Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!
Date: 2001-02-14 17:47:46
Message-ID: 200102141747.MAA16893@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> > > Also, could the "-F" option be disabled now that WAL is enabled? Or is
> > > there still some reason to encourage/allow folks to use it?
> >
> > I was the one who put it back in after Vadim turned it off ;-) ... and
> > I'll object to any attempt to remove the option.
>
> The description should be updated though:
> http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/runtime-config.htm#RUNTIME-CONFIG-GENERAL
>
> I guess a lot of people have heard the rumour "PG 7.1 offers no-fsync
> performance with fsync turned on" and extrapolated "Imagine what it can do
> if I turn off fsync anyway."

That is a very subtle point, and one I can imagine many people
incorrectly assuming.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Hofman 2001-02-14 18:32:13 Blocking behaviour and other problems
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-02-14 17:46:46 Re: Open 7.1 items