Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command
Date: 2003-02-20 03:32:49
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0302201432180.22147-100000@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 19 Feb 2003, Dave Cramer wrote:

> Justin,
>
> This is certainly the case here. I think IBM is deprecating informix,
> and many informix users are being forced to make a change, and they are
> seriously considering postgres as an alternative.

Do you have any evidence that they are evaluating it?

Gavin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-02-20 03:35:58 Simplifying timezone support
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2003-02-20 03:18:31 Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command