Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command

From: Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command
Date: 2003-02-20 03:18:31
Message-ID: 1045711111.1128.2.camel@inspiron.cramers
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Justin,

This is certainly the case here. I think IBM is deprecating informix,
and many informix users are being forced to make a change, and they are
seriously considering postgres as an alternative.

It behooves us to look at aubit http://aubit4gl.sourceforge.net/ before
making this decision as well.

I believe the aubit project has the potential to move postgres forward
considerably as well.

Dave

On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 21:08, Justin Clift wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
> >
> >>Ok, if a patch were submitted to the parser to allow the syntax in
> >>question would it be considered?
> >
> >
> > I would vote against it ... but that's only one vote.
>
> As a thought, will it add significant maintenance penalties or be
> detrimental?
>
> There seem to be quite a lot of Informix people moving to PostgreSQL
> these days, moreso than Oracle shops. Might have been brought on by
> IBM's purchase of Informix.
>
> Wondering if this one change be a significant improvement in regards to
> making it easier to migrate, or just a minor thing?
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift
>
>
> > regards, tom lane
--
Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cramer Consulting

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2003-02-20 03:32:49 Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2003-02-20 03:04:12 Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command