| From: | Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command |
| Date: | 2003-02-20 03:44:20 |
| Message-ID: | 1045712660.1128.8.camel@inspiron.cramers |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Yes, the company in question is more than evaluating it; this request is
a result of a project to port their application to postgres.
Dave
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 22:32, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> On 19 Feb 2003, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> > Justin,
> >
> > This is certainly the case here. I think IBM is deprecating informix,
> > and many informix users are being forced to make a change, and they are
> > seriously considering postgres as an alternative.
>
> Do you have any evidence that they are evaluating it?
>
> Gavin
--
Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cramer Consulting
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-20 03:47:22 | Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command |
| Previous Message | Jordan Henderson | 2003-02-20 03:41:33 | Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command |