From: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | PgAccess patching |
Date: | 2002-04-22 22:10:19 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0204222245350.2455-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I've looked at a bit of the reports stuff in PgAccess but am a little confused
where to send changes. Do changes here go to the main Postgres CVS repository,
i.e. pgsql-patches, or to Constantin Teodorescu <teo(at)flex(dot)ro> whose site
reportedly holds the latest version of the utility?
The packaging as a separate entity on a separate site seems to indicate that
pgaccess is maintained separately to the main postgres code and yet it's
presence in the main source tree seems to indicate that it's not a maintained
separately. Thinking about it, the contrib/ stuff would seem to be quite
similar in this regard.
Please forgive my asking here but my hackers lists subscription hasn't been
completed yet.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-22 22:11:30 | Re: nested transactions |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-04-22 21:49:55 | Re: nested transactions |