Re: PgAccess patching

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PgAccess patching
Date: 2002-04-23 23:56:11
Message-ID: 200204232356.g3NNuBM02454@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
>
>
> I've looked at a bit of the reports stuff in PgAccess but am a little confused
> where to send changes. Do changes here go to the main Postgres CVS repository,
> i.e. pgsql-patches, or to Constantin Teodorescu <teo(at)flex(dot)ro> whose site
> reportedly holds the latest version of the utility?
>
> The packaging as a separate entity on a separate site seems to indicate that
> pgaccess is maintained separately to the main postgres code and yet it's
> presence in the main source tree seems to indicate that it's not a maintained
> separately. Thinking about it, the contrib/ stuff would seem to be quite
> similar in this regard.
>
> Please forgive my asking here but my hackers lists subscription hasn't been
> completed yet.

You can send to patches and we will review it. If it looks
questionable, we will ask Constantin for comments. Of course, you can
send it to one and CC the other. We certainly are looking for pgaccess
improvements.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dorward Villaruz 2002-04-24 03:41:12 plpgsql
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2002-04-23 23:53:37 Re: Performance Issues with count()