Re: nested transactions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: "Steven D(dot) Arnold" <stevena(at)neosynapse(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: nested transactions
Date: 2002-04-22 22:11:30
Message-ID: 27970.1019513490@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> "Steven D. Arnold" <stevena(at)neosynapse(dot)net> wrote:
>> Also, are nexted transactions "on the board," and if so, when/what
>> release are they planned for?

> They're on the TODO list, but AFAIK no one has volunteered to implement
> them yet.

Steven should probably be warned that this is a "don't hold your breath"
kind of thing. AFAICS, nested transactions would require a huge amount
of work by very knowledgeable hackers (for example, looking at nearly
every error-exit condition in the backend, to see if it's going to cause
a problem with continuing the current transaction). The small number
of people who could do it have other priorities.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul M Foster 2002-04-22 22:31:43 Re: Returns from ExecTuplesOk() SOLVED
Previous Message Nigel J. Andrews 2002-04-22 22:10:19 PgAccess patching