Re: tuple too big error

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: schmid(at)ice(dot)mpg(dot)de, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: tuple too big error
Date: 2001-04-04 08:45:39
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0104041842370.4197-100000@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Richard,

On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Richard Huxton wrote:

> >
> > Did I overlook something? Is it necessary to import such a long string as
> a
> > large object?
> >
> > I am using PostgreSQL 7.0.3 under SuSE Linux 7.1.
>
> Afraid you have overlooked something - the 8k row limit applies to text
> fields too. You'll either need to use 7.1 (at release candidate stage) where
> this limit no longer applies, or large-objects.

Main problem with large objects with postgres 7.0 series (and before
this) is that ext2 does not scale well when number of hard links in a
given directory grows to anything like what I would expect a database with
DNA sequences in it would require.

I believe some directory splitting was planned for 7.1 release but I have
not seen this in the beta releases.

Gavin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message J.H.M. Dassen Ray 2001-04-04 08:51:52 Re: PostgreSQL and Rational Purify
Previous Message DaVinci 2001-04-04 07:45:09 unrecognized language plpgsql