Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape
Date: 2000-01-18 23:28:32
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0001180145290.411-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2000-01-17, Tom Lane mentioned:

> > Hmm, maybe this is not what I meant. I meant adding the linking line to
> > pg_dump, not libpq.
>
> Not a usable answer: that would mean that *every* application using
> libpq would have to start including backend/port/snprintf.o, on the
> platforms where vsnprintf doesn't exist.

Nevermind. I got it all backwards.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-01-18 23:38:18 gperf anyone?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-01-18 23:28:27 Re: [HACKERS] Foreign keys: unexpected result from ALTER TABLE... ADD CONSTRAINT...