From: | "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)lan2wan(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tim Perdue <perdue(at)raccoon(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] Performance |
Date: | 1999-03-10 02:52:06 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.04.9903092150510.18400-100000@dragosani.lan2wan.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Tim Perdue wrote:
> Some time back I sent out a message asking if PGSQL would be able to handle
> my mailing list archive at http://www.geocrawler.com/ , and whether it would
> scale up to 100MB.
>
> BELIEVE IT OR NOT, PostgreSQL is handling 1.8GB in just one table, and its
> performance is amazing. I have archived 1,100,000 emails in the database and
> I don't really see much slowdown yet.
>
> I'm just stunned at how well this is working, and I keep pushing myself to
> find more and more mail archives to add to my database.
>
> It's fun! Check out the linux/freebsd/etc mail archives at geocrawler.com
Yeah, I've got a database I'm still putting together, several tables of
which have over 2 million rows. It's returning queries in under 30
seconds or so, in most cases. You just gotta make sure you have you
indices set up properly.
Brett W. McCoy
http://www.lan2wan.com/~bmccoy/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Losing your drivers' license is just God's way of saying "BOOGA, BOOGA!"
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GAT dpu s:-- a C++++ UL++++$ P+ L+++ E W++ N+ o K- w--- O@ M@ !V PS+++
PE Y+ PGP- t++ 5- X+ R+@ tv b+++ DI+++ D+ G++ e>++ h+(---) r++ y++++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 1999-03-10 03:11:42 | Re: [SQL] Performance |
Previous Message | Karl Denninger | 1999-03-10 02:50:18 | Re: [SQL] Performance |