| From: | Karl Denninger <karl(at)Denninger(dot)Net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Clark Evans <clark(dot)evans(at)manhattanproject(dot)com>, Tim Perdue <perdue(at)raccoon(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [SQL] Performance |
| Date: | 1999-03-10 02:50:18 |
| Message-ID: | 19990309205018.A16780@Denninger.Net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 02:29:45AM +0000, Clark Evans wrote:
> Tim Perdue wrote:
> > BELIEVE IT OR NOT, PostgreSQL is handling 1.8GB in just one table, and its
> > performance is amazing. I have archived 1,100,000 emails in the database and
> > I don't really see much slowdown yet.
>
> What is your hardware, os, etc?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Clark Evans
I have had tables exceeding 10GB in one dataset, and the performance wa
STILL excellent. Hardware was a Pentium Pro 200, FreeBSD, and a CMD RAID
controller.
--
--
Karl Denninger (karl(at)denninger(dot)net) http://www.mcs.net/~karl
I ain't even *authorized* to speak for anyone other than myself, so give
up now on trying to associate my words with any particular organization.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brett W. McCoy | 1999-03-10 02:52:06 | Re: [SQL] Performance |
| Previous Message | Clark Evans | 1999-03-10 02:29:45 | Re: [SQL] Performance |