From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple? |
Date: | 2008-10-27 23:56:26 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.64.0810271955030.28764@leary.csoft.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Kris Jurka wrote:
> The problem with trying to deprecate it is that the vast majority of the
> backend is still using the old interfaces, so people looking for
> inspiration for their external modules will likely end up using the old
> interface. Like Alvaro I started this conversion a while ago, got
> bored, and forgot about it. If people do want this conversion done while
> keeping the old interface around, I can track down that patch, update it
> and finish it up for the next CommitFest.
>
Here's a patch that changes everything over to the the new API and
implements the old API by calling the new API.
Kris Jurka
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
use-new-heaptuple-api.patch.gz | application/octet-stream | 28.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-28 00:35:52 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rework subtransaction commit protocol for hot standby. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-27 23:31:18 | Re: Visibility map, partial vacuums |