Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date: 2003-01-13 15:01:38
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.44.0301131000450.39187-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote:

> On 13 Jan 2003 at 9:45, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 greg(at)turnstep(dot)com wrote:
> >
> > > > FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
> > > > WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.
> > >
> > > Sorry to be dense, but what time period is this for?
> >
> > Any given day. It's disk space, not traffic.
>
> I think anyone thinking of putting up a mirror will want to know
> traffic volumes.

The only info I could give was what I already did. My above statement
was to clarify the above numbers.

Vince.
--
Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond! http://www.pop4.net/
http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com
Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-01-13 15:15:26 Re: default to WITHOUT OIDS?
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2003-01-13 14:59:14 Re: pg_get_constraintdef