Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

From: "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date: 2003-01-13 14:56:11
Message-ID: 3E228D3B.7459.248E669C@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 13 Jan 2003 at 9:45, Vince Vielhaber wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 greg(at)turnstep(dot)com wrote:
>
> > > FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
> > > WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.
> >
> > Sorry to be dense, but what time period is this for?
>
> Any given day. It's disk space, not traffic.

I think anyone thinking of putting up a mirror will want to know
traffic volumes.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2003-01-13 14:59:14 Re: pg_get_constraintdef
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2003-01-13 14:45:41 Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?