Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date: 2003-01-13 14:45:41
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.44.0301130939520.39187-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 greg(at)turnstep(dot)com wrote:

> > FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
> > WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.
>
> Sorry to be dense, but what time period is this for?

Any given day. It's disk space, not traffic.

> > On www/ftp.us I don't even notice the bandwidth, it's less than the normal
> > traffic for Pop4 (an ISP) and the streaming audio uses up even more than
> > that.
>
> Sounds like the mirrors could easily absorb more of the traffic from the
> main page, especially once we get an easier mirroring system in place.

The mirrors now consist of the Users Lounge - links, docs and mailing list
info. If it shrinks much more there won't be any reason to mirror.

Vince.
--
Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond! http://www.pop4.net/
http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com
Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2003-01-13 14:56:11 Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Previous Message greg 2003-01-13 14:20:07 Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?