Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

From: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date: 2003-01-13 15:15:30
Message-ID: 20030113151530.GC3889@wallace.ece.rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:01:38AM -0500, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > On 13 Jan 2003 at 9:45, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 greg(at)turnstep(dot)com wrote:
> > >
> > > > > FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
> > > > > WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry to be dense, but what time period is this for?
> > >
> > > Any given day. It's disk space, not traffic.
> >
> > I think anyone thinking of putting up a mirror will want to know
> > traffic volumes.
>
> The only info I could give was what I already did. My above statement
> was to clarify the above numbers.

And there was a statement upthread from someone (Marc?) indicating that
the bandwidth was down in the noise for them (as an ISP).

Ross

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2003-01-13 15:22:21 Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-13 15:15:26 Re: default to WITHOUT OIDS?