Re: Performance lossage in checkpoint dumping

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim4o(at)email(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Performance lossage in checkpoint dumping
Date: 2001-02-17 04:58:05
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.33.0102170057250.81548-100000@mobile.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > >> But I'm not going to touch it for 7.1...
> >
> > > No way to group the writes to you can keep the most recent one open?
> >
> > Don't see an easy way, do you?
> >
>
> No, but I haven't looked at it. I am now much more concerned with the
> delay, and am wondering if I should start thinking about trying my idea
> of looking for near-committers and post the patch to the list to see if
> anyone likes it for 7.1 final. Vadim will not be back in enough time to
> write any new code in this area, I am afraid.

Near committers? *puzzled look*

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-02-17 05:18:42 Re: beta5 ...
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-02-17 04:56:24 Re: beta5 ...