Re: Performance lossage in checkpoint dumping

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim4o(at)email(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Performance lossage in checkpoint dumping
Date: 2001-02-17 03:46:05
Message-ID: 200102170346.WAA28120@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> But I'm not going to touch it for 7.1...
>
> > No way to group the writes to you can keep the most recent one open?
>
> Don't see an easy way, do you?
>

No, but I haven't looked at it. I am now much more concerned with the
delay, and am wondering if I should start thinking about trying my idea
of looking for near-committers and post the patch to the list to see if
anyone likes it for 7.1 final. Vadim will not be back in enough time to
write any new code in this area, I am afraid.

We could look to fix this in 7.1.1. Let's see what the pgbench tester
comes back with when he sets the delay to zero.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-02-17 03:47:03 Re: Re: beta5 ...
Previous Message Lincoln Yeoh 2001-02-17 03:43:31 Re: beta5 ...