| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim4o(at)email(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Performance lossage in checkpoint dumping |
| Date: | 2001-02-17 05:34:43 |
| Message-ID: | 200102170534.AAA08271@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > No, but I haven't looked at it. I am now much more concerned with the
> > delay, and am wondering if I should start thinking about trying my idea
> > of looking for near-committers and post the patch to the list to see if
> > anyone likes it for 7.1 final. Vadim will not be back in enough time to
> > write any new code in this area, I am afraid.
>
> Near committers? *puzzled look*
Umm, uh, it means backends that have entered COMMIT and will be issuing
an fsync() of their own very soon. It took me a while to remember what
I mean too because I was thinking of CVS committers.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-17 05:37:58 | Re: Re: beta5 ... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-17 05:27:34 | Re: beta5 ... |