Re: Performance lossage in checkpoint dumping

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim4o(at)email(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Performance lossage in checkpoint dumping
Date: 2001-02-17 05:34:43
Message-ID: 200102170534.AAA08271@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > No, but I haven't looked at it. I am now much more concerned with the
> > delay, and am wondering if I should start thinking about trying my idea
> > of looking for near-committers and post the patch to the list to see if
> > anyone likes it for 7.1 final. Vadim will not be back in enough time to
> > write any new code in this area, I am afraid.
>
> Near committers? *puzzled look*

Umm, uh, it means backends that have entered COMMIT and will be issuing
an fsync() of their own very soon. It took me a while to remember what
I mean too because I was thinking of CVS committers.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-02-17 05:37:58 Re: Re: beta5 ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-17 05:27:34 Re: beta5 ...