From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Adam Lang <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ... |
Date: | 2001-01-18 13:53:14 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.31.0101180951450.548-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
okay, so far, its all been positive feedback on this, so I'm going to go
ahead with it ... with one slight change ...
when we did the php list, I did it as:
pgsql-php(at)postgresql(dot)org -and- comp.databases.postgresql.interfaces.php
that way, for email purposes, the address was shorter, less to type in ...
I'd like to do the same with the jdbc and odbc lists, unless anyone has an
objection to typing 11 characters less in an email address? :)
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Adam Lang wrote:
> I agree also... I don't do C programming, so a huge chunk of the list info I
> scan and delete. Sounds logical.
>
> Adam Lang
> Systems Engineer
> Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
> http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Oscar Serrano" <oserra(at)fondos(dot)net>
> To: <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 4:02 AM
> Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
>
>
> >
> >
> > > -----Mensaje original-----
> > > De: pgsql-interfaces-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > > [mailto:pgsql-interfaces-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]En nombre de Dave Page
> > > Enviado el: jueves, 18 de enero de 2001 9:06
> > > Para: 'The Hermit Hacker'; pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > > Asunto: RE: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: The Hermit Hacker [mailto:scrappy(at)hub(dot)org]
> > > > Sent: 18 January 2001 03:26
> > > > To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > > > Subject: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > After some discussions with various members of the project, it was
> > > > suggested that an RFC be sent out to the -interfaces list asking for
> > > > opinions ...
> > > >
> > > > Due to the growing volume on these lists, primarily around
> > > > the ODBC and
> > > > JDBC drivers, I'm proposing that a split to this list be
> > > > made, so that we
> > > > have:
> >
> >
> > I completly agree. I'm not interested in JDBC nor ODBC.
> > thank you.
> >
> > Oscar Serrano.
>
>
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Stephenson | 2001-01-18 14:42:06 | Re: Number of rows in a ResultSet ? |
Previous Message | Gunnar R|nning | 2001-01-18 13:49:23 | Re: Fixes and enhancements to JDBC driver (take 2) |