Re: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...

I agree also... I don't do C programming, so a huge chunk of the list info I
scan and delete. Sounds logical.

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Oscar Serrano" <oserra(at)fondos(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 4:02 AM
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...

>
>
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: pgsql-interfaces-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > [mailto:pgsql-interfaces-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]En nombre de Dave Page
> > Enviado el: jueves, 18 de enero de 2001 9:06
> > Para: 'The Hermit Hacker'; pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Asunto: RE: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: The Hermit Hacker [mailto:scrappy(at)hub(dot)org]
> > > Sent: 18 January 2001 03:26
> > > To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > > Subject: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > After some discussions with various members of the project, it was
> > > suggested that an RFC be sent out to the -interfaces list asking for
> > > opinions ...
> > >
> > > Due to the growing volume on these lists, primarily around
> > > the ODBC and
> > > JDBC drivers, I'm proposing that a split to this list be
> > > made, so that we
> > > have:
>
>
> I completly agree. I'm not interested in JDBC nor ODBC.
> thank you.
>
> Oscar Serrano.