Re: [HACKERS] PL code and fmgr_addr

On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Jan Wieck wrote:

> >
> > On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Jan Wieck wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Another problem I found with the PL code was that it took the fmgr()
> > > > macro, and made it call a function call to fmgr_addr, which just killed
> > > > performance.
> > > >
> > > > I made fmgr_addr() a macro too.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Bruce Momjian
> > > > maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Just to let you know - after fixing some other problems
> > > caused by the bpchar trouble my PLtcl tests went through
> > > again. Looks the macroization is O.K.
> >
> > Do we have regression tests for this?
> >
> >
> >
>
> No - since PLtcl isn't part of the distribution up to now.
> And I think that even if we include PLtcl into the dist we
> shouldn't include it into the regression tests because
> building PLtcl requires a Tcl installation (at least the
> libtcl??.so and tclConfig.sh).
>
> But it would be O.K. for me to include the PLtcl to the
> contrib directory and setup a separate test suite there.

Wait...didn't we just do a patch so that PLs could be used? Do we
have regression tests for that? LIke we have to triggers?

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org