Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation

From: "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation
Date: 2020-10-08 18:12:47
Message-ID: GVAP278MB010226D15C90933B3C2D198BD20B0@GVAP278MB0102.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Hi Bruce,

>On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 06:34:32AM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> as this does not get any attention on the docs-list, once again here.
>> Any thoughts on this?

>I was hoping someone more experienced with this would comment, but
>seeing none, I will apply it in a day or two to all supported versions?
>Have you tested this output back to 9.5?

I hoped that as well. No, I tested down to 9.6 because the change happened in 10.

Regards
Daniel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-10-08 18:32:00 Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2020-10-08 16:23:10 Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-10-08 18:32:00 Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-10-08 17:17:25 Re: [PATCH] ecpg: fix progname memory leak