From: | "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation |
Date: | 2020-10-08 18:12:47 |
Message-ID: | GVAP278MB010226D15C90933B3C2D198BD20B0@GVAP278MB0102.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Hi Bruce,
>On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 06:34:32AM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> as this does not get any attention on the docs-list, once again here.
>> Any thoughts on this?
>I was hoping someone more experienced with this would comment, but
>seeing none, I will apply it in a day or two to all supported versions?
>Have you tested this output back to 9.5?
I hoped that as well. No, I tested down to 9.6 because the change happened in 10.
Regards
Daniel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-10-08 18:32:00 | Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-10-08 16:23:10 | Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-10-08 18:32:00 | Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-10-08 17:17:25 | Re: [PATCH] ecpg: fix progname memory leak |