From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation |
Date: | 2020-10-08 18:32:00 |
Message-ID: | 20201008183200.GF13054@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 06:12:47PM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> >On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 06:34:32AM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> as this does not get any attention on the docs-list, once again here.
> >> Any thoughts on this?
>
> >I was hoping someone more experienced with this would comment, but
> >seeing none, I will apply it in a day or two to all supported versions?
> >Have you tested this output back to 9.5?
>
> I hoped that as well. No, I tested down to 9.6 because the change happened in
> 10.
OK, so the patch should be applied only to PG 10 and later?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-10-08 19:43:32 | Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation |
Previous Message | Daniel Westermann (DWE) | 2020-10-08 18:12:47 | Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-10-08 19:15:54 | Expansion of our checks for connection-loss errors |
Previous Message | Daniel Westermann (DWE) | 2020-10-08 18:12:47 | Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation |