Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation
Date: 2020-10-08 18:32:00
Message-ID: 20201008183200.GF13054@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 06:12:47PM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> >On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 06:34:32AM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> as this does not get any attention on the docs-list, once again here.
> >> Any thoughts on this?
>
> >I was hoping someone more experienced with this would comment, but
> >seeing none, I will apply it in a day or two to all supported versions?
> >Have you tested this output back to 9.5?
>
> I hoped that as well. No, I tested down to 9.6 because the change happened in
> 10.

OK, so the patch should be applied only to PG 10 and later?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-10-08 19:43:32 Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation
Previous Message Daniel Westermann (DWE) 2020-10-08 18:12:47 Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-10-08 19:15:54 Expansion of our checks for connection-loss errors
Previous Message Daniel Westermann (DWE) 2020-10-08 18:12:47 Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation