Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation
Date: 2020-10-08 16:23:10
Message-ID: 20201008162310.GA13054@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 06:34:32AM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as this does not get any attention on the docs-list, once again here.
> Any thoughts on this?

I was hoping someone more experienced with this would comment, but
seeing none, I will apply it in a day or two to all supported versions?
Have you tested this output back to 9.5?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Westermann (DWE) 2020-10-08 18:12:47 Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation
Previous Message Daniel Westermann (DWE) 2020-10-08 06:34:32 Wrong example in the bloom documentation

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-10-08 16:27:11 Re: [PATCH] ecpg: fix progname memory leak
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-10-08 14:33:06 Re: extensible options syntax for replication parser?