From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "Joe Conway" <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka |
Date: | 2002-08-05 04:09:49 |
Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOOEIACDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> test=# select * from myfoo2() as (a int8, b text, c text, d text, e text);
> ERROR: Query-specified return tuple and actual function return tuple do
> not match
I wonder if that would read a little better (and perhaps be in the active
voice) if it was like below. The word 'actual' seems a little casual, and
do people really know what tuples are?
ERROR: Query-specified function result alias does not match defined function
result type.
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-05 04:19:22 | Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-05 04:08:33 | Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka SRFs) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-05 04:19:22 | Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-05 04:08:33 | Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka SRFs) |