| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joe Conway" <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka |
| Date: | 2002-08-05 04:09:49 |
| Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOOEIACDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> test=# select * from myfoo2() as (a int8, b text, c text, d text, e text);
> ERROR: Query-specified return tuple and actual function return tuple do
> not match
I wonder if that would read a little better (and perhaps be in the active
voice) if it was like below. The word 'actual' seems a little casual, and
do people really know what tuples are?
ERROR: Query-specified function result alias does not match defined function
result type.
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-05 04:19:22 | Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-05 04:08:33 | Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka SRFs) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-05 04:19:22 | Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-05 04:08:33 | Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka SRFs) |