From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions |
Date: | 2025-03-03 15:05:18 |
Message-ID: | EFE22B1C-C193-4738-B21A-72E3F489EFD3@justatheory.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mar 3, 2025, at 08:39, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> As promised, here is a blog article that provides more context and information about what this feature will mean in Kubernetes with CloudNativePG: https://www.gabrielebartolini.it/articles/2025/03/the-immutable-future-of-postgresql-extensions-in-kubernetes-with-cloudnativepg/
Very nice writeup, thank you. Makes me wish for the bandwidth to get back to and start refining the PGXN OCI RFC to specify tags and/or metadata for the distribution of different contents, including:
* Full extension distribution (as currently written)
* Distribution with only pkglibdir and sharedir contents
* Distribution with only pkglibdir contents
* Distribution with only sharedir contents
I think we could come up with a standard that would work very nicely for a variety of use cases.
Will have to see if I can scrounge up the time for it.
Best,
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2025-03-03 15:10:44 | Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions |
Previous Message | Melanie Plageman | 2025-03-03 14:40:00 | Re: Introduce "log_connection_stages" setting. |