Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions
Date: 2025-03-03 15:10:44
Message-ID: 70A7F219-BE72-4BAB-BAE7-B7114A1AC9EE@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mar 3, 2025, at 10:05, David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> wrote:

> Very nice writeup, thank you. Makes me wish for the bandwidth to get back to and start refining the PGXN OCI RFC

Forgot to link to the POC[1]. The RFC[2] is not OCI-specific, but the POC demonstrates the “full content” version. Will likely want to modify the binary distribution RFC to adopt a standard layout that allows for volume mounting to “install” an extension.

Best,

David

1: https://justatheory.com/2024/06/trunk-oci-poc/
2: https://github.com/pgxn/rfcs/pull/2

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vitaly Davydov 2025-03-03 15:12:12 Re: Slot's restart_lsn may point to removed WAL segment after hard restart unexpectedly
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2025-03-03 15:05:18 Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions