Re: PostgreSQL License

> On Sep 18, 2019, at 6:55 PM, Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On 9/18/19 6:03 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:20 PM Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Charging for installing PostgreSQL is not the same as charging for PostgreSQL.
>>>
>>> Bottom line: you charge for services you provide not for software that other people provide.
>>>
>> That's just really not true. There is nothing that prohibits you from selling Postgresql. I mean, it's not a great business model because you can get it for free, but there's nothing that stops you from doing it.
>
> Quoting Adrian Klaver in this thread from about eight hours ago: "You cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL."
>
>
>
That was my thought actually. By legitimate I meant in good conscience as opposed to any comment on the legality
> --
> Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.