| From: | Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL License |
| Date: | 2019-09-19 00:55:34 |
| Message-ID: | 2b5bfcb4-6516-3e38-71e8-bb7779d71442@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
On 9/18/19 6:03 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:20 PM Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> Charging for *installing* PostgreSQL is not the same as charging for
> PostgreSQL.
>
> Bottom line: you charge for *services**you provide* not for software
> that other people provide.
>
> That's just really not true. There is nothing that prohibits you from
> selling Postgresql. I mean, it's not a great business model because you
> can get it for free, but there's nothing that stops you from doing it.
Quoting Adrian Klaver in this thread from about eight hours ago: "You cannot
(legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL."
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ken Tanzer | 2019-09-19 01:26:29 | Re: PostgreSQL License |
| Previous Message | Ken Tanzer | 2019-09-18 23:03:02 | Re: PostgreSQL License |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ken Tanzer | 2019-09-19 01:26:29 | Re: PostgreSQL License |
| Previous Message | Ken Tanzer | 2019-09-18 23:03:02 | Re: PostgreSQL License |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jerry Sievers | 2019-09-19 01:15:00 | Re: pgbackrest - question about restoring cluster to a new cluster on same server |
| Previous Message | Ken Tanzer | 2019-09-18 23:03:02 | Re: PostgreSQL License |