Re: pgbackrest - question about restoring cluster to a new cluster on same server

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgbackrest - question about restoring cluster to a new cluster on same server
Date: 2019-09-19 01:31:07
Message-ID: d4cbb3f6-80ac-ee8c-a0a0-78a54a7b27ae@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 9/18/19 6:59 PM, Ron wrote:
>
> Scenario: there's data corruption on production server, so we need to do
> a PITR restore from "a few days ago" of the cluster holding the prod
> databases to a second cluster on that same VM in order to try and find
> the missing data and load it back into the prod cluster.
>
> Other than putting a high I/O load on the LUN where repo-path is located
> (from both writing WALs to it and reading the backed up files), will
> there be any problems when "pg_ctl start" processes recovery.conf and
> applies the WAL files to the new cluster while the prod cluster is
> writing new WAL files.
>
> Does my question make sense?

It does, but the answer lies outside of pgBackRest. "Can the repo
storage handle the load of archive-push and archive-get at the same
time" is really a question of storage and network throughput.

pgBackRest compresses everything by default which goes a long way
towards increasing throughput, but ultimately we don't control the
bandwidth.

Having said that, if the storage and network throughput are sufficient,
restoring and recovering a standby using pgBackRest will not impact the
primary as a direct pg_basebackup will.

Regards,

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron 2019-09-19 01:35:21 Re: PostgreSQL License
Previous Message Rob Sargent 2019-09-19 01:27:41 Re: PostgreSQL License