| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Christopher Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Utility database |
| Date: | 2005-06-17 20:11:57 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E490E593@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of
> Christopher Browne
> Sent: 17 June 2005 19:59
> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Utility database
>
> Thus, "sys_shared", "def_share", "user_commons" are all sorts of names
> that suggest that this is some sort of default/shared area.
I like the first. The second and third seem less obvious to me.
'default_shared' should definitely get the point across, though it's a
little long.
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-06-17 20:44:52 | Re: Utility database |
| Previous Message | Brusser, Michael | 2005-06-17 19:57:22 | Re: MemoryContextAlloc: invalid request size |