Dave Page wrote:
>>Thus, "sys_shared", "def_share", "user_commons" are all sorts of names
>>that suggest that this is some sort of default/shared area.
>>
>>
>
>I like the first. The second and third seem less obvious to me.
>'default_shared' should definitely get the point across, though it's a
>little long.
>
>
>
>
It strikes me that these names just might have some significance to
developers but will have none at all for users. I don't heve a better
alternative ... maybe because the purpose has been expressed somewhat
fuzzily.
cheers
andrew