Re: which "wx2.6" should we use ?

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Raphaël Enrici <blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr>
Cc: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "PgAdmin Hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: which "wx2.6" should we use ?
Date: 2005-05-05 20:39:43
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E490DB9E@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr]
> Sent: 05 May 2005 21:03
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Andreas Pflug; PgAdmin Hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] which "wx2.6" should we use ?
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> >>[mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of
> >>Raphaël Enrici
> >>Sent: 05 May 2005 20:43
> >>To: Andreas Pflug
> >>Cc: PgAdmin Hackers
> >>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] which "wx2.6" should we use ?
> >>
> >> --with-flavour=pga3
> >
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > What the heck does that do?
>
> something I love! But, let's take a look to the content of the package
> I'm building for wx2.6:
> ...
> /usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.6-pga3/wx/
> ...
> /usr/bin/wx-config->/usr/lib/wx/config/gtk2-unicode-debug-stat
> ic-2.6-pga3
> ...
> an so on...
>
> It helps me not clashing with files provided by other wx
> packages for my
> own package :)
>
> That's something I learnt from Ron in the end of last year when he was
> preparing a wx 2.5 release for Debian.

Very cool.

/D

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Raphaël Enrici 2005-05-05 20:47:06 acinclude.m4 and wx detection question
Previous Message Raphaël Enrici 2005-05-05 20:02:58 Re: which "wx2.6" should we use ?