| From: | Raphaël Enrici <blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, PgAdmin Hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: which "wx2.6" should we use ? |
| Date: | 2005-05-05 20:02:58 |
| Message-ID: | 427A7BF2.7030101@club-internet.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>[mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of
>>Raphaël Enrici
>>Sent: 05 May 2005 20:43
>>To: Andreas Pflug
>>Cc: PgAdmin Hackers
>>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] which "wx2.6" should we use ?
>>
>> --with-flavour=pga3
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> What the heck does that do?
something I love! But, let's take a look to the content of the package
I'm building for wx2.6:
...
/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.6-pga3/wx/
...
/usr/bin/wx-config->/usr/lib/wx/config/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.6-pga3
...
an so on...
It helps me not clashing with files provided by other wx packages for my
own package :)
That's something I learnt from Ron in the end of last year when he was
preparing a wx 2.5 release for Debian.
Raph.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-05-05 20:39:43 | Re: which "wx2.6" should we use ? |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-05-05 19:56:11 | Re: which "wx2.6" should we use ? |